Briq
/
django-admin-confirm-briq
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity
django-admin-confirm-briq/admin_confirm/tests
History
Thu Trang Pham 4f50c63f7b
WIP: 2021 02 24 dockerize (#18) 
* Use cache for most fields and admin form for m2m files

* MR comments/clean up

* Cache should obey exclude and fields

* Some more tests and docs

* Only use cache for image files

* Even more tests and handle save as new

* fix test

* More tests

* minor refactor

* Improve test coverage

* Adding tests for fieldsets

* Added cache timeout

* Added another test for an edge case

* Fix issue with ManagementForm tampered with

* Update cache to only set when form is_multipart

* Even more testing changes

* Dockerize

* Setting up tests in docker

* Update github actions

* Got first integration test to work

* Refactor a bit

* Fix github action yml

* Use docker-compose up -d in github actions

* combine coveralls

* Updated readme

* Clean up code

* Remove dup code from rebase

Co-authored-by: Thu Trang Pham <thu@joinmodernhealth.com>
 		2021-03-03 07:42:24 -08:00
..
integration WIP: 2021 02 24 dockerize (#18) 2021-03-03 07:42:24 -08:00
unit WIP: 2021 02 24 dockerize (#18) 2021-03-03 07:42:24 -08:00
README.md fix(MR-16): Use cache for FileField and ImageField (#17) 2021-02-27 15:39:01 -08:00
helpers.py WIP: 2021 02 24 dockerize (#18) 2021-03-03 07:42:24 -08:00

README.md

Testing Documentation/Notes

Coverage Status

Hello, friend! You have found the list of test cases that this package can benefit from.

You seem concerned about the stability and reliability of this package. You're probably wondering if you should include it in your production codebase. Well, although I have tried very hard to get 100% code coverage, there are so many permutations of ModelAdmins in the wild. And I'm only one person.

So if you want to include this package in your production codebase, be aware that AdminConfirmMixin works best with simple unmodified ModelAdmins.

Save Options

  • Save
  • Conitnue
  • Save As New
  • Add another

Field types

  • CharField

  • PositiveIntegerField

  • DecimalField

  • TextField

  • ImageField

  • FileField

  • ManyToManyField

  • OneToOneField

  • ForeignKey

  • Custom Readonly fields

Options

  • .exclude
  • .fields
  • .readonly_fields
  • Actions

Options to test

  • ModelAdmin.fieldsets
  • ModelAdmin.form
  • ModelAdmin.raw_id_fields
  • ModelAdmin.radio_fields
  • ModelAdmin.autocomplete_fields
  • ModelAdmin.prepopulated_fields

ModelAdmin form template overrides?

https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.1/ref/contrib/admin/#custom-template-options (Maybe??? IDK this is esoteric)

Function overrides to test

  • .save_model()
  • .get_readonly_fields()
  • .get_fields()
  • .get_excludes()
  • .get_form()
  • .get_autocomplete_fields()
  • .get_prepopulated_fields()
  • .get_fieldsets()
  • ModelAdmin.formfield_for_manytomany()
  • ModelAdmin.formfield_for_foreignkey()
  • ModelAdmin.formfield_for_choice_field()
  • ModelAdmin.get_changeform_initial_data()

Inline instance support??

Confirmation on inline changes is not a current feature of this project.

Confirmation on add/change of ModelAdmin that includes inlines needs to be tested. Use AdminConfirmMixin with ModelAdmin containing inlines at your own risk.

  • .inlines
  • .get_inline_instances()
  • .get_inlines() (New in Django 3.0)
  • .get_formsets_with_inlines()

Options for inlines

  • classes of inlines: Tabular, Stacked, etc
  • extra
  • action on the inline: add or change
  • clicking add another on the inline

IDK if we want to support these

  • .get_changelist_form()

  • ModelAdmin.list_editable

  • ModelAdmin.changelist_view()

  • ModelAdmin.add_view(request, form_url='', extra_context=None)

  • ModelAdmin.change_view(request, object_id, form_url='', extra_context=None)

More tests for these?

Note: Currently the code always calls super()._changeform_view(), which would ensure permissions correct as well

  • ModelAdmin.has_add_permission
  • ModelAdmin.has_change_permission