diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 38eace8..de643f3 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -218,8 +218,8 @@ ordering on top of that just seemed a little much in my opinion.
 django-admin-sortable is currently used in production.
 
 
-### What's new in 1.5?
-- More Brazilian Portugese translations (Thanks to @gladson)
+### What's new in 1.5.1?
+- Fixed a bug that could cause the change_form template to not be populated correctly when adding a new record.
 
 
 ### Future
diff --git a/adminsortable/__init__.py b/adminsortable/__init__.py
index 661aa59..e1c4760 100755
--- a/adminsortable/__init__.py
+++ b/adminsortable/__init__.py
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-VERSION = (1, 5, 0)  # following PEP 386
+VERSION = (1, 5, 1)  # following PEP 386
 DEV_N = None
 
 
diff --git a/adminsortable/admin.py b/adminsortable/admin.py
index 3efd4d4..555f6c3 100644
--- a/adminsortable/admin.py
+++ b/adminsortable/admin.py
@@ -168,6 +168,16 @@ class SortableAdmin(SortableAdminBase, ModelAdmin):
         }
         return render(request, self.sortable_change_list_template, context)
 
+    def add_view(self, request, form_url='', extra_context=None):
+        if extra_context is None:
+            extra_context = {}
+
+        extra_context.update({
+            'change_form_template_extends': self.change_form_template_extends
+        })
+        return super(SortableAdmin, self).add_view(request, form_url,
+            extra_context=extra_context)
+
     def change_view(self, request, object_id, extra_context=None):
         self.has_sortable_tabular_inlines = False
         self.has_sortable_stacked_inlines = False