parent
08ee36ee3e
commit
eff9872799
|
|
@ -606,8 +606,8 @@ ordering on top of that just seemed a little much in my opinion.
|
||||||
### Status
|
### Status
|
||||||
django-admin-sortable is currently used in production.
|
django-admin-sortable is currently used in production.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### What's new in 2.1.13?
|
### What's new in 2.1.14?
|
||||||
- Fixed an issue when sorting was performed on an object referenced by a raw_id field
|
- Improved filtering of querystring values. Thanks to [@stephrdev](https://github.com/stephrdev)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Future
|
### Future
|
||||||
- Better template support for foreign keys that are self referential. If someone would like to take on rendering recursive sortables, that would be super.
|
- Better template support for foreign keys that are self referential. If someone would like to take on rendering recursive sortables, that would be super.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -745,10 +745,10 @@ Status
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
django-admin-sortable is currently used in production.
|
django-admin-sortable is currently used in production.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
What’s new in 2.1.13?
|
What’s new in 2.1.14?
|
||||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Fixed an issue when sorting was performed on an object referenced by a raw_id field
|
- Improved filtering of querystring values. Thanks to `@stephrdev <https://github.com/stephrdev>`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Future
|
Future
|
||||||
~~~~~~
|
~~~~~~
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||||
VERSION = (2, 1, 13)
|
VERSION = (2, 1, 14)
|
||||||
DEV_N = None
|
DEV_N = None
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue