django-polymorphic/CHANGES.rst

381 lines
13 KiB
ReStructuredText

*django_polymorphic*
++++++++++++++++++++
Changelog
++++++++++++++++++++
2013-02-28 Releasing Polymorphic v.0.3
======================================
Many changes to the codebase happened, but no new version was released to pypi
for years.
0.3 contains fixes submitted by many contributors, huge thanks to everyone!
Juli 5, 2012, Polymorphic admin interface
=========================================
Added a polymorphic admin interface. The admin interface is able to add polymorphic models,
and the admin edit screen also displays the custom fields of the polymorphic model.
2011-12-20 Renaming, refactoring, new maintainer
================================================
Since the original author diseappeared from the internet, we undertook to
maintain and upgrade this piece of software.
It works really well, but we cannot guarantee or otherwise support its current
state.
The latest "legacy" tag should be V1.0-RC-1. Anything above that should be
considered experimental and unstable until further notice (there be dragons).
New features, bug fixes and other improvements will be added to trunk from now
on.
2011-01-24 V1.0 Release Candidate 1
===================================
Bugfixes
------------------------
* Fixed GitHub issue 15 (query result incomplete with inheritance).
Thanks to John Debs for reporting and the test case.
------------------------------------------------------------------
2010-11-11 V1.0 Beta 2
======================
This is a V1.0 Testing Release
------------------------------
Beta 2 accumulated somewhat more changes than intended, and also
has been delayed by DBMS benchmark testing I wanted to do on model
inheritance. These benchmarks show that there are considerable
problems with concrete model inheritance and contemporary DBM systems.
The results will be forthcoming on the google discussion forum.
Please also see:
http://www.jacobian.org/writing/concrete-inheritance/
The API should be stable now with Beta 2, so it's just about potential
bugfixes from now on regarding V1.0.
Beta 2 is still intended for testing and development environments and not
for production. No complaints have been heard regarding Beta 1 however,
and Beta 1 is used on a few production sites by some enterprising users.
There will be a release candidate for V1.0 in the very near future.
New Features and API changes in Beta 2 since Beta 1
---------------------------------------------------
* API CHANGE: ``.extra()`` has been re-implemented. Now it's polymorphic by
default and works (nearly) without restrictions (please see docs). This is a (very)
incompatible API change regarding previous versions of django_polymorphic.
Support for the ``polymorphic`` keyword parameter has been removed.
You can get back the non-polymorphic behaviour by using
``ModelA.objects.non_polymorphic().extra(...)``.
* API CHANGE: ``ShowFieldContent`` and ``ShowFieldTypeAndContent`` now
use a slightly different output format. If this causes too much trouble for
your test cases, you can get the old behaviour back (mostly) by adding
``polymorphic_showfield_old_format = True`` to your model definitions.
``ShowField...`` now also produces more informative output for custom
primary keys.
* ``.non_polymorphic()`` queryset member function added. This is preferable to
using ``.base_objects...``, as it just makes the resulting queryset non-polymorphic
and does not change anything else in the behaviour of the manager used (while
``.base_objects`` is just a different manager).
* ``.get_real_instances()``: implementation modified to allow the following
more simple and intuitive use::
>>> qs = ModelA.objects.all().non_polymorphic()
>>> qs.get_real_instances()
which is equivalent to::
>>> ModelA.objects.all()
* added member function:
``normal_q_object = ModelA.translate_polymorphic_Q_object(enhanced_q_object)``
* misc changes/improvements
Bugfixes
------------------------
* Custom fields could cause problems when used as the primary key.
In derived models, Django's automatic ".pk" field does not always work
correctly for such custom fields: "some_object.pk" and "some_object.id"
return different results (which they shouldn't, as pk should always be just
an alias for the primary key field). It's unclear yet if the problem lies in
Django or the affected custom fields. Regardless, the problem resulting
from this has been fixed with a small workaround.
"python manage.py test polymorphic" also tests and reports on this problem now.
Thanks to Mathieu Steele for reporting and the test case.
------------------------------------------------------------------
2010-10-18 V1.0 Beta 1
======================
This is a V1.0 Beta/Testing Release
-----------------------------------
This release is mostly a cleanup and maintenance release that also
improves a number of minor things and fixes one (non-critical) bug.
Some pending API changes and corrections have been folded into this release
in order to make the upcoming V1.0 API as stable as possible.
This release is also about getting feedback from you in case you don't
approve of any of these changes or would like to get additional
API fixes into V1.0.
The release contains a considerable amount of changes in some of the more
critical parts of the software. It's intended for testing and development
environments and not for production environments. For these, it's best to
wait a few weeks for the proper V1.0 release, to allow some time for any
potential problems to show up (if they exist).
If you encounter any such problems, please post them in the discussion group
or open an issue on GitHub or BitBucket (or send me an email).
There also have been a number of minor API changes.
Please see the README for more information.
New Features
------------------------
* official Django 1.3 alpha compatibility
* ``PolymorphicModel.__getattribute__`` hack removed.
This improves performance considerably as python's __getattribute__
generally causes a pretty large processing overhead. It's gone now.
* the ``polymorphic_dumpdata`` management command is not needed anymore
and has been disabled, as the regular Django dumpdata command now automatically
works correctly with polymorphic models (for all supported versions of Django).
* ``.get_real_instances()`` has been elevated to an official part of the API::
real_objects = ModelA.objects.get_real_instances(base_objects_list_or_queryset)
allows you to turn a queryset or list of base objects into a list of the real instances.
This is useful if e.g. you use ``ModelA.base_objects.extra(...)`` and then want to
transform the result to its polymorphic equivalent.
* ``translate_polymorphic_Q_object`` (see DOCS)
* improved testing
* Changelog added: CHANGES.rst/html
Bugfixes
------------------------
* Removed requirement for primary key to be an IntegerField.
Thanks to Mathieu Steele and Malthe Borch.
API Changes
-----------
**polymorphic_dumpdata**
The management command ``polymorphic_dumpdata`` is not needed anymore
and has been disabled, as the regular Django dumpdata command now automatically
works correctly with polymorphic models (for all supported versions of Django).
**Output of Queryset or Object Printing**
In order to improve compatibility with vanilla Django, printing quersets
(__repr__ and __unicode__) does not use django_polymorphic's pretty printing
by default anymore. To get the old behaviour when printing querysets,
you need to replace your model definition:
>>> class Project(PolymorphicModel):
by:
>>> class Project(PolymorphicModel, ShowFieldType):
The mixin classes for pretty output have been renamed:
``ShowFieldTypes, ShowFields, ShowFieldsAndTypes``
are now:
``ShowFieldType, ShowFieldContent and ShowFieldTypeAndContent``
(the old ones still exist for compatibility)
**Running the Test suite with Django 1.3**
Django 1.3 requires ``python manage.py test polymorphic`` instead of
just ``python manage.py test``.
------------------------------------------------------------------
2010-2-22
==========
IMPORTANT: API Changed (import path changed), and Installation Note
The django_polymorphic source code has been restructured
and as a result needs to be installed like a normal Django App
- either via copying the "polymorphic" directory into your
Django project or by running setup.py. Adding 'polymorphic'
to INSTALLED_APPS in settings.py is still optional, however.
The file `polymorphic.py` cannot be used as a standalone
extension module anymore, as is has been split into a number
of smaller files.
Importing works slightly different now: All relevant symbols are
imported directly from 'polymorphic' instead from
'polymorphic.models'::
# new way
from polymorphic import PolymorphicModel, ...
# old way, doesn't work anymore
from polymorphic.models import PolymorphicModel, ...
+ minor API addition: 'from polymorphic import VERSION, get_version'
New Features
------------------------
Python 2.4 compatibility, contributed by Charles Leifer. Thanks!
Bugfixes
------------------------
Fix: The exception "...has no attribute 'sub_and_superclass_dict'"
could be raised. (This occurred if a subclass defined __init__
and accessed class members before calling the superclass __init__).
Thanks to Mattias Brändström.
Fix: There could be name conflicts if
field_name == model_name.lower() or similar.
Now it is possible to give a field the same name as the class
(like with normal Django models).
(Found through the example provided by Mattias Brändström)
------------------------------------------------------------------
2010-2-4
==========
New features (and documentation)
-----------------------------------------
queryset order_by method added
queryset aggregate() and extra() methods implemented
queryset annotate() method implemented
queryset values(), values_list(), distinct() documented; defer(),
only() allowed (but not yet supported)
setup.py added. Thanks to Andrew Ingram.
More about these additions in the docs:
http://bserve.webhop.org/wiki/django_polymorphic/doc
Bugfixes
------------------------
* fix remaining potential accessor name clashes (but this only works
with Django 1.2+, for 1.1 no changes). Thanks to Andrew Ingram.
* fix use of 'id' model field, replaced with 'pk'.
* fix select_related bug for objects from derived classes (till now
sel.-r. was just ignored)
"Restrictions & Caveats" updated
----------------------------------------
* Django 1.1 only - the names of polymorphic models must be unique
in the whole project, even if they are in two different apps.
This results from a restriction in the Django 1.1 "related_name"
option (fixed in Django 1.2).
* Django 1.1 only - when ContentType is used in models, Django's
seralisation or fixtures cannot be used. This issue seems to be
resolved for Django 1.2 (changeset 11863: Fixed #7052, Added
support for natural keys in serialization).
------------------------------------------------------------------
2010-1-30
==========
Fixed ContentType related field accessor clash (an error emitted
by model validation) by adding related_name to the ContentType
ForeignKey. This happened if your polymorphc model used a ContentType
ForeignKey. Thanks to Andrew Ingram.
------------------------------------------------------------------
2010-1-29
==========
Restructured django_polymorphic into a regular Django add-on
application. This is needed for the management commands, and
also seems to be a generally good idea for future enhancements
as well (and it makes sure the tests are always included).
The ``poly`` app - until now being used for test purposes only
- has been renamed to ``polymorphic``. See DOCS.rst
("installation/testing") for more info.
------------------------------------------------------------------
2010-1-28
==========
Added the polymorphic_dumpdata management command (github issue 4),
for creating fixtures, this should be used instead of
the normal Django dumpdata command.
Thanks to Charles Leifer.
Important: Using ContentType together with dumpdata generally
needs Django 1.2 (important as any polymorphic model uses
ContentType).
------------------------------------------------------------------
2010-1-26
==========
IMPORTANT - database schema change (more info in change log).
I hope I got this change in early enough before anyone started
to use polymorphic.py in earnest. Sorry for any inconvenience.
This should be the final DB schema now.
Django's ContentType is now used instead of app-label and model-name
This is a cleaner and more efficient solution
Thanks to Ilya Semenov for the suggestion.